The final stage of a PRINCE2® project should include the activities (and products) required for an orderly project closure (see the diagram).
Sometimes organizations choose to mandate ‘closure stages’ after the specialist delivery work of the project is complete, but this is not a requirement of the method.
In fact, project closure can occur in two broad contexts:
Closing a project prematurely does not necessarily imply failure - and often represents good project management practice.
The project may need to be terminated for any number of reasons:
As well as:
Whether the project has been successful or not, whether the reasons for closure are perceived as positive or negative, it is always good practice to implement an orderly closure.
There are three priorities to consider:
These three factors need to be provided for in the Stage Plan for the final stage (or, in the event of early termination, in the Exception Plan).
The key products concerned are:
The Project Board must ensure that these activities are covered when authorizing the relevant plans.
(see the section covering ‘Authorize a Stage or Exception Plan’).
Even a failed project may yield significant benefits - the Advanced Passenger Train (APT) example given in the section covering ‘Authorize a Stage or Exception Plan’ illustrates this potential.
It is always worthwhile to identify lessons that can be learned from project failures.
Note that the Project Board activity described in this chapter occurs after the closure work has been completed.
Its purpose is for the Project Board to ensure that an orderly closure has been achieved - and, effectively, it constitutes the last act of the project.
All references above are in Directing Successful Projects with PRINCE2 unless stated otherwise.
PRINCE2® is a Registered Trade Mark of the Office of Government Commerce in the United Kingdom and other countries.